🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," said one European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to mimic Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers show that governments internationally are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.